HP1.2 · Thermal storage and the charge–hold–discharge chain
Thermal storage can move electricity consumption away from the process delivery window, but the stored quantity, usable temperature range and recovery opportunity must all match. This lesson tracks one heat duty through a complete electrically charged storage chain.
Learning objectives
- Distinguish sensible, latent and other storage mechanisms from the useful-service boundary.
- Calculate charge energy and connection/window constraints without mixing MWh_e and MWh_th.
- Identify why large nominal capacity can still fail a time-limited duty.
Allow 30–45 minutes including derivations and exercises. All numerical values are teaching assumptions.
1. Stored heat is a state, not a delivery guarantee
Sensible storage uses a material temperature change, latent storage uses a phase transition and other technologies may use reversible reactions. Their useful output depends on material states, heat-transfer equipment and the required outlet condition. A nominal MWh_th rating must therefore state the charge/discharge endpoints and the temperature window that remains useful to the process. [H1]
In the simplified tool, a stated usable fraction translates nominal storage into heat that may be withdrawn over that window. Holding retention applies to a specified dwell period, and discharge efficiency translates the retained usable heat to the process meter. These are explicit screening assumptions, not universal material properties.
2. Work backward from the heat duty
A 2 MW_th process for six hours needs 12 MWh_th useful delivery. If holding retention is 95% for the declared dwell and discharge efficiency is 90%, required usable heat before holding is 12 / (0.95 × 0.90) = 14.0351 MWh_th. With a 90% usable fraction, nominal storage needs at least 15.5945 MWh_th before any separate engineering margin.
An 18 MWh_th store at a 90% usable fraction offers 16.2 MWh_th before holding, so the energy-capacity screen passes. But the discharge heat exchanger must also supply at least 2 MW_th at the required delivery condition throughout the event. Enough heat quantity does not establish adequate discharge power or outlet temperature.
Target charge–hold–discharge energy
3. Charging needs its own energy and power budget
Assume direct electric charging converts electricity to stored heat at 98% efficiency. To establish 14.0351 MWh_th, the target charge input is 14.3215 MWh_e. An eight-hour charging window requires an average 1.7902 MW_e. Use the smaller of charging equipment power and net site charging headroom to assess that window.
At 2 MW_e net charging power over eight hours, the available 16 MWh_e passes. At 1.5 MW_e only 12 MWh_e is available, so the recharge target fails even though the store itself is large enough. Adding more thermal capacity does not solve this electrical bottleneck. The first tool assumes charging precedes delivery in a separate, non-overlapping state.
4. Separate holding loss from a conversion efficiency
A retention fraction of 95% means 95% of the selected heat remains after the stated dwell under the specified environment and state. It is not a universal hourly loss rate and cannot be reused unchanged for an arbitrary hold duration. Similarly, a quoted round-trip efficiency may already include holding, auxiliaries or discharge loss.
In this case 14.0351 MWh_th becomes 13.3333 MWh_th after holding, then 12 MWh_th at the useful meter after discharge. The chain is a teaching reconciliation of target energy, not a dynamic temperature simulation. Temperature distribution, exchanger performance, pressure, cycling and standby needs remain specialist validation tasks.
5. A cheaper charging period is only one economic input
At a hypothetical charge price of 50 per MWh_e, the target charging energy costs about 716.07. The earlier boiler baseline at 40/MWh_fuel and 85% efficiency costs 564.71 for the same 12 MWh_th. Storage may pass the stated physical screen yet have a higher period energy bill. No conclusion about total project value follows from either energy cost alone.
A full assessment adds capital, electrical demand charges, integration, maintenance, source changes, production impact, backup and retirement, and may value flexibility only where evidence supports it. Do not count the same flexible heat twice as both protected process reserve and an unrestricted market service.
Case and independent exercises
Fictional TES duty: deliver 12 MWh_th over six hours at a guaranteed process condition. Nominal storage is 18 MWh_th with a 90% useful window, 95% holding retention and 90% discharge efficiency. Direct electric charging is 98% efficient, with eight hours available. Compare 2 MW_e and 1.5 MW_e net charging headroom; assume 50 per MWh_e charging energy.
- Calculate required usable stored heat and target electrical charge energy.
- Check the storage capacity, discharge power requirement and both charging windows.
- Compare energy cost with the stated boiler baseline and explain the remaining unknowns.
Worked answers and reasoning
Attempt the exercises before opening each answer.
Answer 1 · Reverse the full loss chain
Required pre-hold usable heat is 12/(0.95×0.90)=14.0351 MWh_th. Electrical charge input is 14.0351/0.98=14.3215 MWh_e. Nominal storage required at a 90% usable fraction is 15.5945 MWh_th. This assumes the quoted fractions are independent and not already included in a net rating.
Answer 2 · Capacity does not close the time window
Usable capacity is 18×0.90=16.2 MWh_th, above 14.0351. Delivery requires at least 2 MW_th throughout the six-hour event. The eight-hour 2 MW_e window offers 16 MWh_e and passes; 1.5 MW_e offers only 12 MWh_e and fails. The average target charge power is 1.7902 MW_e.
Answer 3 · Preserve the unfavourable result
Target charge energy costs 14.3215×50≈716.07, above the boiler’s 564.71 for the duty. This does not decide total lifecycle value: capital, fees, maintenance, integration, production risk and evidence-backed flexibility value remain outside this energy-only calculation. Temperature and installed acceptance evidence also remain necessary.
Decision method to take away
Size and test the complete charge–hold–discharge chain on a useful heat boundary; nominal storage and cheap electricity are insufficient on their own.
Sources and review date
Reviewed 26 October 2026. Text, diagrams and exercises are original. All numerical cases use stated teaching assumptions, rather than site measurements or manufacturer commitments. These primary sources support the technical background; verify their applicability to each project.
[H1] ARENA / HILT CRC · TES for Industrial Process Heat: A Practical Guide (2026) ↗
Integrated assessment of process heat and thermal storage.
[H2] IEA · How a Heat Pump Works ↗
Heat-source, useful-output and COP concepts.
[H3] IEA · Heat Pump Monitor 2026: Key Findings ↗
Industrial integration, temperature and economic context.
[H4] DOE · Industrial Heat Pumps for Steam and Fuel Savings ↗
Foundational engineering explanation; not a current local approval rule.