These are scopes you can enquire about. Actual work depends on evidence quality, specialist responsibilities and an agreed engagement. An online diagnostic does not replace design approval, market qualification or investment diligence.
Stage 1 · Evidence and utility readiness
Required inputs
Please provide the site location, phased IT and facility loads, utility correspondence and continuity requirements. These establish the boundary of the first review.
Intended outputs
The review should identify missing evidence, set out an initial capacity balance and produce questions the utility needs to answer.
Stage 2 · Pre-feasibility option review
Required inputs
Provide the applicable tariff, installed quotations, asset limits, fuel and permit conditions, together with the failure scenarios the facility must withstand.
Intended outputs
The review should compare equivalent-scope alternatives, explain the assumptions that change their ranking and define the required specialist studies.
Stage 3 · Delivery and decision support
Required inputs
Provide the connection agreement, procurement plan and commissioning scope, and identify the party responsible for each remaining risk.
Intended outputs
The intended outputs are a decision brief and a traceable action register, supported by the evidence required for acceptance.
State the country, your role, current stage, decision needed and timing. List available documents and missing information. The guide diagnostic can transfer its results into the enquiry form. Never include passwords or system credentials.
References and review date
Reviewed 25 October 2026. Teaching derivations and project methods are original; the following sources provide background and do not replace project-specific requirements.